Ripple Bay vs Treasure at Tampines
Tampines, Pasir Ris · Compare recorded prices, project facts and buyer perspectives.
Price snapshot
Median price per square foot
Ripple Bay
S$1,213 / sqft
Treasure at Tampines
S$1,435 / sqft
Recorded project-level medians. Bars share a zero baseline; these figures are not a matched-period price trend.
Side by side
Recent medians use up to 10 latest recorded sales per project. Dates and unit mixes can differ; this is not a like-for-like valuation.
| Metric | Ripple Bay | Treasure at Tampines |
|---|---|---|
| Median PSF | S$1,213 | S$1,435 |
| Recent median price | S$1,129,000 | S$1,450,000 |
| Recent median PSF | S$1,425 | S$1,813 |
| Recent records sampled | 10 | 10 |
| District | District 18 | District 18 |
| Property type | Condominium | Condominium |
| Tenure | 99 yrs lease commencing from 2011 | 99 yrs lease commencing from 2018 |
| Total units | Not available | Not available |
| Completion year | Not available | Not available |
| Total transaction records | 249 | 1,963 |
What the data says
Buyer perspectives
AI-generated context for Ripple Bay and Treasure at Tampines. Treat this as a starting point, not a personalised recommendation.
First-time buyers
Ripple Bay offers a more accessible entry point for first-time buyers with a median PSF of $1,213.429. This represents a lower capital outlay compared to Treasure at Tampines, which has a higher median PSF of $1,435.08.Investors
Treasure at Tampines demonstrates higher transaction volume with 1,963 recorded sales, compared to 249 transactions at Ripple Bay. The project also maintains a higher median PSF of $1,435.08 and a newer leasehold tenure commencing from 2018.Families
Families seeking lease longevity may prefer Treasure at Tampines as its 99-year lease started in 2018, seven years later than Ripple Bay's 2011 commencement. Those prioritizing space within a fixed budget may consider Ripple Bay, where the $1,213.429 median PSF is lower than the $1,435.08 PSF at Treasure at Tampines.